Moving right along, I hope you’re beginning to get the
picture of how to lay all of this out so that you can make logical decisions.
So far, we’ve talked about the plaintiff. Let’s talk a
little about what happens if you are the one getting sued. Many times the first
time you’ll know that you are a defendant in a lawsuit is when someone hands
you a bunch of papers.
The first thing to do once you’ve gotten served with papers
is NOTHING!!
I don’t mean forever.
Obviously they need to be addressed. But right at the
outset, don’t do a thing. Put them on the table or the desk or whatever, and
only later, when you’ve had a chance to relax and contemplate things, pick them
up and start laying out your own options.
First of course the lawsuit has to be responded to.
But
you’ve got time.
The shortest period that I’m aware of is twenty days (from the
time you receive the papers) with the more popular trend being around thirty
days.
Now that doesn’t mean to leave them sitting on the counter until the last
day. It does mean though, that you take the time to carefully consider your
options.
From this angle you don’t have nearly as many options, but
you still have more than most people realize.
Let’s take a look at some of the things you can do to
shuffle things more to your liking.
Obviously, you can’t decide whether the lawsuit is started
or not, it’s there in front of you, but there are some things that you can do
about how it progresses.
First, do your own assessment from the plaintiff’s
perspective. Why is this guy suing you? What does he hope to get? What is he
after?
Here’s an example. We recently helped someone that had been
sued for huge sums of money by someone who more money than he knew what to do
with. Had to stop and think – what’s this about? He’s not going to get any
money, and doesn’t need it anyway. Where is this going?
Turns out all the plaintiff wanted was for the defendant to “stop
saying bad things about him”.
Not every lawsuit is
that easy to dispose of, but at least start by trying to figure out what’s
really going on.
The big advantage that you have in this regard is that even
if there is an attorney involved for the plaintiff, you can still pick up the
phone and call the plaintiff.
The professional rules of ethics are what preclude an
attorney from speaking directly to someone who is represented. They don’t apply
to you when you represent yourself!! You can talk to whoever you choose.
Oh yes – you’ll get the letter on the fancy letterhead from
the attorney telling you that all communications are to go through him. In as
polite, or as rude a way as you choose, you can tell him to stuff it. If the
plaintiff does not wish to talk to you, he is free to ignore you, hang up on
you, or tell you to go away. But unless he does, or unless a court orders you
otherwise, you can contact him.
This is more than just an ego issue. We’ll talk on down the
road about attorneys, their fees and their billing practices. Attorneys can be
as big an impediment to a quick and easy resolution of a case as any other
single factor. After all, why would they let a case settle early on, when it
can be settled later after they’ve billed thousands of dollars in fees?
Remember the case I just mentioned? It didn’t settle right
away. It had gone well into the discovery phase, with documents flowing back and
forth, pretrial conferences scheduled. The defendant was in touch with the
plaintiff’s attorneys constantly – never did they suggest or even mention settlement. Why would they?
Their meter is running at four or five hundred dollars an hour!!! The defendant
finally picked up the phone one day, called the plaintiff and just flat out
said – “this is silly what can we do to settle this.” That’s all it took, but
if that had ever come from the attorneys at all, it would have been on the eve
of trial.
But that was just an example. Let’s move on. The lawsuit is
filed. The plaintiff either won’t talk to you or tells you he’ll see you in
court. (That’s as popular as “sue the bastards”).
Time to lay out a game plan.
The first thing you must understand is the papers, what’s in
them, and the law that applies.
Remember, we’ve been saying all along that
knowledge and information are everything.
This is the time for it. The reason is that the procedure regarding
court papers is very strict.
There are a lot of things that you can do wrong at this
point. There are grounds for defense,
that you can literally by mistake throw away by saying the wrong things, or not
saying needed things in your response. At best you will probably be stuck for the rest
of the lawsuit with what you say in those first papers.
So we stress, this is a point where you either need to do a
lot of research very quickly or get some help.
Be Your Own Lawyer can help you understand the papers that
you’ve received and can explain your options to you. Chances are good that it
won’t even cost you a dime to get this information since we’ll do it as part of
a free case assessment.
If you don’t like Be Your Own Lawyer get someone to look at
it and help. The worst thing you can do is to just toss together a quick
response by saying something like “nothing in the complaint is true” and send
it off. You can literally lose your case, or make it much more difficult to win
at this very early stage with mistakes here.
OK you’ve gotten some help and now you need to make some
decisions on how to respond.
Here are some options. We’re going to discuss each of these
later in a separate post, but here they are for now so that you can be thinking
of them:
- Do you want
to leave the lawsuit where it is or do you want to try to move it?
- Do you have
a possible counterclaim? This is always great sport in that it lets the
plaintiff have a little skin in the game too.
- Is there someone
else that you can bring in? Adding other defendants always spices things up.
- Are there
issues with service or jurisdiction and if so, do you want to bother with them?
- Is the
lawsuit in the court you want to be in? For example if the plaintiff is
representing himself in small claims court, can you up the ante by filing a
counterclaim large enough to get it bumped up to a higher court?
Stay tuned and we’ll discuss these questions and more!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment